Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Dooly Census Tracts
  • County : Dooly Zip Codes
  • County : Dougherty Census Tracts
  • County : Dougherty Zip Codes
  • County : Lee Census Tracts
  • County : Lee Zip Codes
  • County : Macon Census Tracts
  • County : Macon Zip Codes
  • County : Marion Census Tracts
  • County : Marion Zip Codes
  • County : Mitchell Census Tracts
  • County : Mitchell Zip Codes
  • County : Schley Census Tracts
  • County : Schley Zip Codes
  • County : Stewart Census Tracts
  • County : Stewart Zip Codes
  • County : Sumter Census Tracts
  • County : Sumter Zip Codes
  • County : Terrell Census Tracts
  • County : Terrell Zip Codes
  • County : Webster Census Tracts
  • County : Webster Zip Codes
  • County : Worth Census Tracts
  • County : Worth Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010402

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010402

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010402 has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095010402 has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010403

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010403

12.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010403 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095010403 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010500

17.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010500 has a value of 17.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095010500 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010601

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010601

24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010601 has a value of 24.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095010601 has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010602

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010602

19.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010602 has a value of 19.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095010602 has a value of 19.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010700

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010700

12.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010700 has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095010700 has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010900

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095010900

17.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010900 has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095010900 has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011000

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011000

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011000 has a value of 14.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095011000 has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011200

17.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011200 has a value of 17.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095011200 has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011300

16.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011300 has a value of 16.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095011300 has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011400

24.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011400 has a value of 24.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095011400 has a value of 24.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011600

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13095011600

14.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011600 has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13095011600 has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020100

10.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020100 has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13177020100 has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020200

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020200 has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13177020200 has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020300

10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020300 has a value of 10.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13177020300 has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020402

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020402

9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020402 has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13177020402 has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020403

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13177020403

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020403 has a value of 9.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13177020403 has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13193000100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13193000100

19.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000100 has a value of 19.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13193000100 has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13193000200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13193000200

21.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000200 has a value of 21.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13193000200 has a value of 21.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13193000300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13193000300

15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000300 has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13193000300 has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13193000400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13193000400

18.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000400 has a value of 18.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13193000400 has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13197920100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13197920100

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13197920100 has a value of 13.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13197920100 has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13197920200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13197920200

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13197920200 has a value of 16.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13197920200 has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090100

15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090100 has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13205090100 has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090200

17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090200 has a value of 17.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13205090200 has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090300

23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090300 has a value of 23.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13205090300 has a value of 23.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090400

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090400 has a value of 13.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13205090400 has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13205090500

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090500 has a value of 16.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13205090500 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13249960100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13249960100

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13249960100 has a value of 15.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13249960100 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13249960200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13249960200

10.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13249960200 has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13249960200 has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13259950100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13259950100

19.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13259950100 has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13259950100 has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13259950400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13259950400

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13259950400 has a value of 16.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13259950400 has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950100

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950100 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13261950100 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950200

13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950200 has a value of 13.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13261950200 has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950300

17.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950300 has a value of 17.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13261950300 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950400

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950400 has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13261950400 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950500

13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950500 has a value of 13.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13261950500 has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950600

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950600

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950600 has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13261950600 has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950700

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950700

12.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950700 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13261950700 has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950800

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13261950800

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950800 has a value of 15.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13261950800 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13273120200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13273120200

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120200 has a value of 16.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13273120200 has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13273120300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13273120300

19.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120300 has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13273120300 has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13273120400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13273120400

20.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120400 has a value of 20.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13273120400 has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13273120500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13273120500

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120500 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13273120500 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13307960100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13307960100

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960100 has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13307960100 has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13307960200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13307960200

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960200 has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13307960200 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950100

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950100 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13321950100 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950200

14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950200 has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13321950200 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950400

14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950400 has a value of 14.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13321950400 has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950500

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950500 has a value of 13.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13321950500 has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950600

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 13321950600

12.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950600 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 13321950600 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Diabetes

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Dooly

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Dooly

31.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 31.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Dooly has a value of 31.4 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Dooly has a value of 31.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Dooly (31.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.4).
Prior Value
(24.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dooly value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Dougherty

100.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 100.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Dougherty has a value of 100.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Dougherty has a value of 100.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (100.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (85.1).
Prior Value
(85.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Lee

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Lee

18.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 18.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Lee has a value of 18.9 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Lee has a value of 18.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lee (18.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.6).
Prior Value
(22.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Macon

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Macon

22.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 22.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Macon has a value of 22.0 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Macon has a value of 22.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Macon (22.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.5).
Prior Value
(15.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Macon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Marion

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Marion

23.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 23.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Marion has a value of 23.0 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Marion has a value of 23.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Marion (23.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.9).
Prior Value
(19.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marion value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Mitchell

24.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 24.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Mitchell has a value of 24.3 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Mitchell has a value of 24.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (24.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.9).
Prior Value
(25.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Schley

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Schley

53.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 53.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Schley has a value of 53.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Schley has a value of 53.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Schley (53.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (54.6).
Prior Value
(54.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Schley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Stewart

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Stewart

45.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 45.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Stewart has a value of 45.6 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Stewart has a value of 45.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Stewart (45.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (46.1).
Prior Value
(46.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Stewart value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Sumter

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Sumter

49.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 49.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Sumter has a value of 49.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Sumter has a value of 49.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (49.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.0).
Prior Value
(42.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Terrell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Terrell

71.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 71.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Terrell has a value of 71.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Terrell has a value of 71.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Terrell (71.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (64.4).
Prior Value
(64.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Terrell value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Webster

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Webster

34.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 34.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.1), Webster has a value of 34.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Webster has a value of 34.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Webster (34.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (48.7).
Prior Value
(48.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Webster value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Worth

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Worth

63.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 63.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (23.6), Worth has a value of 63.6 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Worth has a value of 63.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Worth (63.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (57.8).
Prior Value
(57.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Dooly

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Dooly

345.9
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 345.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Dooly has a value of 345.9 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dooly (345.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (375.3).
Prior Value
(375.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dooly value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Dougherty

456.3
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 456.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Dougherty has a value of 456.3 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (456.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (476.8).
Prior Value
(476.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Lee

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Lee

175.2
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 175.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Lee has a value of 175.2 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (175.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (240.9).
Prior Value
(240.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Macon

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Macon

682.7
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 682.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Macon has a value of 682.7 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Macon (682.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (705.9).
Prior Value
(705.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Macon value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Marion

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Marion

289.0
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 289.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Marion has a value of 289.0 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Marion (289.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (250.3).
Prior Value
(250.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marion value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Mitchell

701.2
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 701.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Mitchell has a value of 701.2 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (701.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (596.6).
Prior Value
(596.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Schley

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Schley

386.9
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 386.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Schley has a value of 386.9 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Schley (386.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (270.4).
Prior Value
(270.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Schley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Stewart

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Stewart

572.0
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 572.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Stewart has a value of 572.0 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Stewart (572.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (344.5).
Prior Value
(344.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Stewart value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Sumter

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Sumter

754.3
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 754.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Sumter has a value of 754.3 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (754.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (821.0).
Prior Value
(821.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Terrell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Terrell

384.2
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 384.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Terrell has a value of 384.2 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Terrell (384.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (409.2).
Prior Value
(409.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Terrell value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Webster

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Webster

1,428.2
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 1,428.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Webster has a value of 1,428.2 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Webster (1,428.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (1,663.7).
Prior Value
(1,663.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Webster value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Worth

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Diabetes County: Worth

401.9
ER visits per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 401.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 379.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 158 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (301.1), Worth has a value of 401.9 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(301.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (401.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (429.3).
Prior Value
(429.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Dooly

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Dooly

273.7
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 273.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Dooly has a value of 273.7 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dooly (273.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (290.3).
Prior Value
(290.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dooly value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Dougherty

401.6
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 401.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Dougherty has a value of 401.6 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (401.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (381.3).
Prior Value
(381.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Lee

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Lee

119.2
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 119.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Lee has a value of 119.2 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (119.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (194.5).
Prior Value
(194.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Macon

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Macon

507.9
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 507.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Macon has a value of 507.9 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Macon (507.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (740.3).
Prior Value
(740.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Macon value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Marion

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Marion

215.1
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 215.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Marion has a value of 215.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Marion (215.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (133.6).
Prior Value
(133.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marion value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Mitchell

314.9
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 314.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Mitchell has a value of 314.9 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (314.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (257.0).
Prior Value
(257.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Schley

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Schley

342.5
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 342.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 242.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.6.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (204.8), Schley has a value of 342.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(204.8)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Schley (342.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (318.5).
Prior Value
(318.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Schley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Stewart

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Stewart

291.5
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 291.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Stewart has a value of 291.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Stewart (291.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (314.5).
Prior Value
(314.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Stewart value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Sumter

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Sumter

373.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 373.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Sumter has a value of 373.0 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (373.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (365.8).
Prior Value
(365.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Terrell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Terrell

316.1
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 316.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Terrell has a value of 316.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Terrell (316.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (301.1).
Prior Value
(301.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Terrell value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Webster

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Webster

621.7
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 621.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Webster has a value of 621.7 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Webster (621.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (293.7).
Prior Value
(293.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Worth

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes County: Worth

300.1
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 300.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 238.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 300.4.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to the GA Value (206.5), Worth has a value of 300.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (300.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (323.7).
Prior Value
(323.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Dooly

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Dooly

30.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 30.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 30.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Dooly has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Dooly has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dooly (30.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dooly value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Dougherty

28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Dougherty has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Dougherty has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (28.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.0%).
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Lee

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Lee

28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Lee has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Lee has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (28.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.0%).
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Macon

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Macon

28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Macon has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Macon has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Macon (28.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.0%).
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Macon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Marion

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Marion

29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 29.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Marion has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Marion has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marion (29.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marion value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Mitchell

29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 29.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Mitchell has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Mitchell has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (29.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Schley

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Schley

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Schley has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Schley has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Schley has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Schley (26.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Schley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Stewart

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Stewart

34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 34.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 34.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Stewart has a value of 34.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Stewart has a value of 34.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Stewart (34.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Stewart value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Sumter

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Sumter

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Sumter has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Sumter has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (26.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Terrell

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Terrell

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Terrell has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Terrell has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Terrell (26.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Terrell value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Webster

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Webster

30.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 30.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Webster has a value of 30.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Webster has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Webster has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Webster (30.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Webster value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Worth

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Worth

31.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 31.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 31.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (25.0%), Worth has a value of 31.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Worth has a value of 31.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (31.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (30.0%).
Prior Value
(30.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Dooly

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Dooly

89.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 89.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 89.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Dooly has a value of 89.4% which is higher and better.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Dooly has a value of 89.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dooly (89.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.9%).
Prior Value
(81.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dooly value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Dougherty

90.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Dougherty has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Dougherty has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (90.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.6%).
Prior Value
(83.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Lee

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Lee

91.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Lee has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Lee has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (91.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.1%).
Prior Value
(86.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Macon

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Macon

87.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 87.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 87.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Macon has a value of 87.2% which is lower and worse.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Macon has a value of 87.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Macon (87.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.3%).
Prior Value
(83.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Macon value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Marion

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Marion

75.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 75.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 75.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Marion has a value of 75.5% which is lower and worse.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Marion has a value of 75.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marion (75.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.8%).
Prior Value
(76.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marion value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Mitchell

87.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 87.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 87.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Mitchell has a value of 87.3% which is lower and worse.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Mitchell has a value of 87.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (87.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.7%).
Prior Value
(69.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Schley

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Schley

69.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 69.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Schley has a value of 69.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Schley has a value of 69.2% which is lower and worse.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Schley has a value of 69.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Schley (69.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.2%).
Prior Value
(79.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Schley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Stewart

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Stewart

81.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 81.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 81.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Stewart has a value of 81.3% which is lower and worse.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Stewart has a value of 81.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Stewart (81.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.7%).
Prior Value
(93.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Stewart value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Sumter

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Sumter

84.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 84.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 84.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Sumter has a value of 84.5% which is lower and worse.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Sumter has a value of 84.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (84.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.5%).
Prior Value
(84.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Terrell

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Terrell

91.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 91.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 91.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Terrell has a value of 91.7% which is higher and better.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Terrell has a value of 91.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Terrell (91.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.0%).
Prior Value
(84.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Terrell value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Webster

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Webster

85.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 85.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Webster has a value of 85.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Webster has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Webster has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Webster (85.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.1%).
Prior Value
(87.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Webster value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Worth

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Worth

89.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 89.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 89.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (87.5%), Worth has a value of 89.3% which is higher and better.
GA Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Worth has a value of 89.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (89.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.8%).
Prior Value
(85.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Albany

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Albany

37.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Albany has a value of 37.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albany has a value of 37.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (33.3%), Albany has a value of 37.5% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Albany has a value of 37.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Albany has a value of 37.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albany value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Americus

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Americus

46.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Americus has a value of 46.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Americus has a value of 46.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (32.2%), Americus has a value of 46.3% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Americus has a value of 46.3% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Americus has a value of 46.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Americus value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Andersonville

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Andersonville

30.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 30.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 30.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (32.2%), Andersonville has a value of 30.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Andersonville has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Andersonville has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Andersonville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Baconton

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Baconton

38.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Baconton has a value of 38.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Baconton has a value of 38.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (44.5%), Baconton has a value of 38.2% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(44.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Baconton has a value of 38.2% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Baconton has a value of 38.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Baconton value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Bronwood

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Bronwood

28.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 28.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 28.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (37.9%), Bronwood has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Bronwood has a value of 28.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Bronwood has a value of 28.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bronwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Buena Vista

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Buena Vista

69.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 69.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 69.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (19.5%), Buena Vista has a value of 69.8% which is higher and worse.
Marion, GA County Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Buena Vista has a value of 69.8% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Buena Vista has a value of 69.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Buena Vista value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Byromville

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Byromville

21.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Byromville has a value of 21.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Byromville has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (36.2%), Byromville has a value of 21.4% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Byromville has a value of 21.4% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Byromville has a value of 21.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Byromville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Camilla

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Camilla

64.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Camilla has a value of 64.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camilla has a value of 64.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (44.5%), Camilla has a value of 64.9% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(44.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Camilla has a value of 64.9% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Camilla has a value of 64.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Camilla value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Dawson

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Dawson

49.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dawson has a value of 49.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dawson has a value of 49.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (37.9%), Dawson has a value of 49.7% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Dawson has a value of 49.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Dawson has a value of 49.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dawson value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): De Soto

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): De Soto

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (32.2%), De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the De Soto value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Dooling

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Dooling

28.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dooling has a value of 28.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dooling has a value of 28.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (36.2%), Dooling has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Dooling has a value of 28.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Dooling has a value of 28.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dooling value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Ellaville

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Ellaville

27.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 27.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 27.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (20.3%), Ellaville has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
Schley, GA County Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Ellaville has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Ellaville has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ellaville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Ideal

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Ideal

56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ideal has a value of 56.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ideal has a value of 56.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (32.1%), Ideal has a value of 56.3% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Ideal has a value of 56.3% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Ideal has a value of 56.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ideal value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Leesburg

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Leesburg

42.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 42.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 42.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (11.4%), Leesburg has a value of 42.0% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Leesburg has a value of 42.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Leesburg has a value of 42.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leesburg value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Leslie

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Leslie

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leslie has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leslie has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (32.2%), Leslie has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Leslie has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Leslie has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leslie value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Lilly

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Lilly

24.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lilly has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lilly has a value of 24.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (36.2%), Lilly has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Lilly has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lilly has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lilly value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Lumpkin

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Lumpkin

84.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 84.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 84.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (25.7%), Lumpkin has a value of 84.7% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Lumpkin has a value of 84.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lumpkin has a value of 84.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lumpkin value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Marshallville

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Marshallville

85.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 85.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 85.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (32.1%), Marshallville has a value of 85.7% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Marshallville has a value of 85.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Marshallville has a value of 85.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Marshallville value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Meigs

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Meigs

46.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Meigs has a value of 46.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meigs has a value of 46.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (44.5%), Meigs has a value of 46.8% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(44.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Meigs has a value of 46.8% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Meigs has a value of 46.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Meigs value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Montezuma

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Montezuma

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (32.1%), Montezuma has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Montezuma has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Montezuma has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Montezuma value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

18.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (32.1%), Oglethorpe has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Oglethorpe has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Oglethorpe has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oglethorpe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Parrott

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Parrott

50.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Parrott has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Parrott has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (37.9%), Parrott has a value of 50.0% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Parrott has a value of 50.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Parrott has a value of 50.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Parrott value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Pelham

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Pelham

32.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pelham has a value of 32.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pelham has a value of 32.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (44.5%), Pelham has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(44.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Pelham has a value of 32.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Pelham has a value of 32.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pelham value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Pinehurst

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Pinehurst

80.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 80.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 80.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (36.2%), Pinehurst has a value of 80.0% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Pinehurst has a value of 80.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Pinehurst has a value of 80.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pinehurst value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Plains

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Plains

15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Plains has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Plains has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (32.2%), Plains has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Plains has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Plains has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Plains value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Poulan

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Poulan

8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Poulan has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Poulan has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (26.7%), Poulan has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Poulan has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Poulan has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Poulan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Putney

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Putney

21.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Putney has a value of 21.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Putney has a value of 21.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (33.3%), Putney has a value of 21.2% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Putney has a value of 21.2% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Putney has a value of 21.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Putney value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Richland

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Richland

10.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Richland has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Richland has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (25.7%), Richland has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Richland has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Richland has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Richland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Sale City

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Sale City

28.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sale City has a value of 28.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sale City has a value of 28.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (44.5%), Sale City has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(44.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Sale City has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Sale City has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sale City value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Sasser

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Sasser

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (37.9%), Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sasser value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Smithville

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Smithville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (11.4%), Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Smithville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Sumner

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Sumner

19.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sumner has a value of 19.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sumner has a value of 19.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (26.7%), Sumner has a value of 19.4% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Sumner has a value of 19.4% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Sumner has a value of 19.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sumner value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Sylvester

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Sylvester

18.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 18.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 18.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (26.7%), Sylvester has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Sylvester has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Sylvester has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sylvester value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Unadilla

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Unadilla

44.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 44.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 44.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (36.2%), Unadilla has a value of 44.6% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Unadilla has a value of 44.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Unadilla has a value of 44.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Unadilla value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Vienna

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Vienna

43.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Vienna has a value of 43.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Vienna has a value of 43.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (36.2%), Vienna has a value of 43.6% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Vienna has a value of 43.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Vienna has a value of 43.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Vienna value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Warwick

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Warwick

15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Warwick has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warwick has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (26.7%), Warwick has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Warwick has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Warwick has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warwick value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Webster County

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place (City): Webster County

24.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Webster County has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 602 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Webster County has a value of 24.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (24.6%), Webster County has a value of 24.6%.
Webster, GA County Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Webster County has a value of 24.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Webster County has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Webster County value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Dooly

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Dooly

36.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Dooly has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Dooly has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dooly value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Dougherty

33.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 33.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 33.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (23.5%), Dougherty has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Dougherty has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dougherty value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.