Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Dooly Census Tracts
  • County : Dooly Zip Codes
  • County : Dougherty Census Tracts
  • County : Dougherty Zip Codes
  • County : Lee Census Tracts
  • County : Lee Zip Codes
  • County : Macon Census Tracts
  • County : Macon Zip Codes
  • County : Marion Census Tracts
  • County : Marion Zip Codes
  • County : Mitchell Census Tracts
  • County : Mitchell Zip Codes
  • County : Schley Census Tracts
  • County : Schley Zip Codes
  • County : Stewart Census Tracts
  • County : Stewart Zip Codes
  • County : Sumter Census Tracts
  • County : Sumter Zip Codes
  • County : Terrell Census Tracts
  • County : Terrell Zip Codes
  • County : Webster Census Tracts
  • County : Webster Zip Codes
  • County : Worth Census Tracts
  • County : Worth Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Value
Compared to:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13205090300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13205090300

67.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090300 has a value of 67.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (68.6%), 13205090300 has a value of 67.1% which is lower and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(68.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13205090300 has a value of 67.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13205090400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13205090400

67.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090400 has a value of 67.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (68.6%), 13205090400 has a value of 67.4% which is lower and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(68.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13205090400 has a value of 67.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13205090500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13205090500

68.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090500 has a value of 68.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (68.6%), 13205090500 has a value of 68.7% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(68.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13205090500 has a value of 68.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13249960100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13249960100

68.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13249960100 has a value of 68.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (68.8%), 13249960100 has a value of 68.7% which is lower and worse.
Schley, GA County Value
(68.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13249960100 has a value of 68.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13249960200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13249960200

71.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13249960200 has a value of 71.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (68.8%), 13249960200 has a value of 71.3% which is higher and better.
Schley, GA County Value
(68.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13249960200 has a value of 71.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13259950100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13259950100

69.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13259950100 has a value of 69.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (68.3%), 13259950100 has a value of 69.4% which is higher and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(68.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13259950100 has a value of 69.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13259950400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13259950400

63.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13259950400 has a value of 63.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (68.3%), 13259950400 has a value of 63.5% which is lower and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(68.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13259950400 has a value of 63.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950100

68.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950100 has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (70.8%), 13261950100 has a value of 68.0% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13261950100 has a value of 68.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950200

69.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950200 has a value of 69.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (70.8%), 13261950200 has a value of 69.4% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13261950200 has a value of 69.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950300

66.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950300 has a value of 66.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (70.8%), 13261950300 has a value of 66.5% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13261950300 has a value of 66.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950400

69.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950400 has a value of 69.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (70.8%), 13261950400 has a value of 69.1% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13261950400 has a value of 69.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950500

71.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950500 has a value of 71.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (70.8%), 13261950500 has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13261950500 has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950600

65.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950600 has a value of 65.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (70.8%), 13261950600 has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13261950600 has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950700

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950700

65.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950700 has a value of 65.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (70.8%), 13261950700 has a value of 65.2% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13261950700 has a value of 65.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950800

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13261950800

69.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950800 has a value of 69.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (70.8%), 13261950800 has a value of 69.7% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13261950800 has a value of 69.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13273120200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13273120200

69.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120200 has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (70.0%), 13273120200 has a value of 69.8% which is lower and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13273120200 has a value of 69.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13273120300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13273120300

67.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120300 has a value of 67.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (70.0%), 13273120300 has a value of 67.4% which is lower and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13273120300 has a value of 67.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13273120400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13273120400

65.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120400 has a value of 65.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (70.0%), 13273120400 has a value of 65.8% which is lower and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13273120400 has a value of 65.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13273120500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13273120500

70.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120500 has a value of 70.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (70.0%), 13273120500 has a value of 70.3% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13273120500 has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13307960100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13307960100

68.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960100 has a value of 68.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (69.9%), 13307960100 has a value of 68.3% which is lower and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(69.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13307960100 has a value of 68.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13307960200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13307960200

68.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960200 has a value of 68.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (69.9%), 13307960200 has a value of 68.4% which is lower and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(69.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13307960200 has a value of 68.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950100

67.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950100 has a value of 67.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.6%), 13321950100 has a value of 67.3% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13321950100 has a value of 67.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950200

69.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950200 has a value of 69.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.6%), 13321950200 has a value of 69.1% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13321950200 has a value of 69.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950400

65.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950400 has a value of 65.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.6%), 13321950400 has a value of 65.4% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13321950400 has a value of 65.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950500

69.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950500 has a value of 69.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.6%), 13321950500 has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13321950500 has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 13321950600

70.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950600 has a value of 70.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.6%), 13321950600 has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 13321950600 has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Dooly

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Dooly

36.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 36.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 36.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Dooly has a value of 36.5 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Dooly has a value of 36.5.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dooly (36.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.8).
Prior Value
(29.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dooly value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Dougherty

35.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 35.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 35.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Dougherty has a value of 35.3 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Dougherty has a value of 35.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (35.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.8).
Prior Value
(40.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Lee

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Lee

51.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 51.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 51.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Lee has a value of 51.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Lee has a value of 51.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (51.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.8).
Prior Value
(53.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Macon

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Macon

50.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 50.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 50.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Macon has a value of 50.7 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Macon has a value of 50.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Macon (50.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.8).
Prior Value
(44.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Macon value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Marion

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Marion

30.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 30.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 30.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Marion has a value of 30.5 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Marion has a value of 30.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marion (30.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.0).
Prior Value
(37.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marion value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mitchell

55.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 55.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 55.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Mitchell has a value of 55.4 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Mitchell has a value of 55.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (55.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.8).
Prior Value
(58.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Stewart

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Stewart

44.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 44.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 44.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Stewart has a value of 44.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Stewart has a value of 44.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Stewart (44.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.1).
Prior Value
(53.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Stewart value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Sumter

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Sumter

64.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 64.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 64.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Sumter has a value of 64.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Sumter has a value of 64.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (64.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.4).
Prior Value
(60.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Terrell

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Terrell

50.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 50.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 50.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Terrell has a value of 50.6 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Terrell has a value of 50.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Terrell (50.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.9).
Prior Value
(50.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Terrell value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Worth

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Worth

31.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 31.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 145 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 31.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (39.3), Worth has a value of 31.1 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(39.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Worth has a value of 31.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (31.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.1).
Prior Value
(36.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Dooly

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Dooly

39.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 39.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 39.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Dooly has a value of 39.2 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Dooly has a value of 39.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dooly (39.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.3).
Prior Value
(43.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dooly value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Dougherty

62.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 62.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 62.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Dougherty has a value of 62.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Dougherty has a value of 62.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (62.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (64.8).
Prior Value
(64.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Lee

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Lee

83.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 83.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 83.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Lee has a value of 83.4 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Lee has a value of 83.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (83.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.7).
Prior Value
(91.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Macon

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Macon

68.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 68.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 68.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Macon has a value of 68.8 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Macon has a value of 68.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Macon (68.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.3).
Prior Value
(67.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Macon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Marion

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Marion

76.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 76.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 76.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Marion has a value of 76.8 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Marion has a value of 76.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marion (76.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.5).
Prior Value
(82.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marion value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mitchell

66.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 66.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 66.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Mitchell has a value of 66.3 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Mitchell has a value of 66.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (66.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.1).
Prior Value
(76.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Schley

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Schley

47.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2013-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 47.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 71.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 79.6.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 154 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Schley has a value of 47.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 77.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,712 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (62.8), Schley has a value of 47.9 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(62.8)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.3), Schley has a value of 47.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(58.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Schley (47.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.9).
Prior Value
(55.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Schley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Stewart

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Stewart

52.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 52.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 52.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Stewart has a value of 52.7 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Stewart has a value of 52.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Stewart (52.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.8).
Prior Value
(55.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Stewart value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Sumter

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Sumter

63.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 63.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 63.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Sumter has a value of 63.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Sumter has a value of 63.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (63.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.1).
Prior Value
(59.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Terrell

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Terrell

81.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 81.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 81.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Terrell has a value of 81.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Terrell has a value of 81.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Terrell (81.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.7).
Prior Value
(72.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Terrell value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Webster

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Webster

89.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 89.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Webster has a value of 89.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Webster has a value of 89.6 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Webster has a value of 89.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Webster (89.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.4).
Prior Value
(83.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Worth

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Worth

83.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 83.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.2.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 156 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 83.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (57.9), Worth has a value of 83.4 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(57.9)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Worth has a value of 83.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (83.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.7).
Prior Value
(85.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Value
Compared to:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Albany

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Albany

78.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Albany has a value of 78.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albany has a value of 78.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), Albany has a value of 78.3% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Albany has a value of 78.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Americus

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Americus

79.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Americus has a value of 79.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Americus has a value of 79.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), Americus has a value of 79.5% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Americus has a value of 79.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Andersonville

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Andersonville

76.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), Andersonville has a value of 76.9% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Andersonville has a value of 76.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Baconton

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Baconton

78.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Baconton has a value of 78.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Baconton has a value of 78.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), Baconton has a value of 78.3% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Baconton has a value of 78.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Bronwood

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Bronwood

79.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 79.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 79.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (72.4%), Bronwood has a value of 79.9% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Bronwood has a value of 79.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Buena Vista

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Buena Vista

78.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 78.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 78.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (71.7%), Buena Vista has a value of 78.2% which is higher and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Buena Vista has a value of 78.2%.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Byromville

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Byromville

78.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Byromville has a value of 78.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Byromville has a value of 78.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), Byromville has a value of 78.4% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Byromville has a value of 78.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Camilla

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Camilla

79.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Camilla has a value of 79.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camilla has a value of 79.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), Camilla has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Camilla has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Dawson

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Dawson

79.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dawson has a value of 79.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dawson has a value of 79.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (72.4%), Dawson has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Dawson has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): De Soto

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): De Soto

80.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, De Soto has a value of 80.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, De Soto has a value of 80.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), De Soto has a value of 80.5% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), De Soto has a value of 80.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Dooling

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Dooling

76.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dooling has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dooling has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), Dooling has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Dooling has a value of 76.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Ellaville

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Ellaville

77.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 77.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 77.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (71.9%), Ellaville has a value of 77.5% which is higher and better.
Schley, GA County Value
(71.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Ellaville has a value of 77.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Ideal

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Ideal

78.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ideal has a value of 78.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ideal has a value of 78.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (71.8%), Ideal has a value of 78.0% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Ideal has a value of 78.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Leesburg

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Leesburg

77.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 77.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 77.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (74.9%), Leesburg has a value of 77.5% which is higher and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Leesburg has a value of 77.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Leslie

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Leslie

78.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leslie has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leslie has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), Leslie has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Leslie has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Lilly

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Lilly

74.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lilly has a value of 74.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lilly has a value of 74.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), Lilly has a value of 74.0% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Lilly has a value of 74.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Lumpkin

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Lumpkin

76.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 76.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 76.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (72.1%), Lumpkin has a value of 76.4% which is higher and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Lumpkin has a value of 76.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Marshallville

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Marshallville

80.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 80.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 80.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (71.8%), Marshallville has a value of 80.1% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Marshallville has a value of 80.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Meigs

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Meigs

78.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Meigs has a value of 78.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meigs has a value of 78.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), Meigs has a value of 78.3% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Meigs has a value of 78.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Montezuma

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Montezuma

78.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 78.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 78.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (71.8%), Montezuma has a value of 78.2% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Montezuma has a value of 78.2%.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

78.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 78.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 78.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (71.8%), Oglethorpe has a value of 78.0% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Oglethorpe has a value of 78.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Parrott

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Parrott

74.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Parrott has a value of 74.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Parrott has a value of 74.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (72.4%), Parrott has a value of 74.7% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Parrott has a value of 74.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Pelham

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Pelham

77.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pelham has a value of 77.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pelham has a value of 77.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), Pelham has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Pelham has a value of 77.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Pinehurst

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Pinehurst

75.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 75.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 75.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), Pinehurst has a value of 75.4% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Pinehurst has a value of 75.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Plains

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Plains

78.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Plains has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Plains has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), Plains has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Plains has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Poulan

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Poulan

72.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Poulan has a value of 72.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Poulan has a value of 72.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), Poulan has a value of 72.9% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Poulan has a value of 72.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Putney

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Putney

76.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Putney has a value of 76.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Putney has a value of 76.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), Putney has a value of 76.4% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Putney has a value of 76.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Richland

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Richland

77.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Richland has a value of 77.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Richland has a value of 77.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (72.1%), Richland has a value of 77.4% which is higher and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Richland has a value of 77.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Sale City

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Sale City

75.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sale City has a value of 75.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sale City has a value of 75.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), Sale City has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Sale City has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Sasser

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Sasser

75.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sasser has a value of 75.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sasser has a value of 75.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (72.4%), Sasser has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Sasser has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Smithville

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Smithville

80.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Smithville has a value of 80.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Smithville has a value of 80.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (74.9%), Smithville has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Smithville has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Sumner

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Sumner

75.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sumner has a value of 75.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sumner has a value of 75.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), Sumner has a value of 75.4% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Sumner has a value of 75.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Sylvester

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Sylvester

77.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 77.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 77.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), Sylvester has a value of 77.0% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Sylvester has a value of 77.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Unadilla

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Unadilla

77.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 77.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 77.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), Unadilla has a value of 77.0% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Unadilla has a value of 77.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Vienna

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Vienna

78.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Vienna has a value of 78.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Vienna has a value of 78.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), Vienna has a value of 78.5% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Vienna has a value of 78.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Warwick

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Warwick

76.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Warwick has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warwick has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), Warwick has a value of 76.9% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Warwick has a value of 76.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Webster County

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place (City): Webster County

76.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Webster County has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Webster County has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (72.1%), Webster County has a value of 76.0% which is higher and better.
Webster, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Webster County has a value of 76.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Dooly

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Dooly

72.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 72.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 72.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Dooly has a value of 72.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Dougherty

73.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 73.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 73.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Dougherty has a value of 73.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Lee

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Lee

74.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Lee has a value of 74.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Macon

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Macon

71.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 71.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 71.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Macon has a value of 71.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Marion

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Marion

71.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 71.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 71.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Marion has a value of 71.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Mitchell

72.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Mitchell has a value of 72.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Schley

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Schley

71.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 71.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Schley has a value of 71.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Schley has a value of 71.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Stewart

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Stewart

72.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Stewart has a value of 72.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Sumter

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Sumter

74.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Sumter has a value of 74.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Terrell

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Terrell

72.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 72.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 72.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Terrell has a value of 72.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Webster

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Webster

72.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Webster has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Webster has a value of 72.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Worth

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Worth

70.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 70.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.6%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 70.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Worth has a value of 70.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31007

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31007

78.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31007 has a value of 78.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31007 has a value of 78.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), 31007 has a value of 78.2% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31007 has a value of 78.2%.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31041

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31041

76.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31041 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31041 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (71.8%), 31041 has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31041 has a value of 76.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31051

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31051

73.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31051 has a value of 73.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31051 has a value of 73.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), 31051 has a value of 73.6% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31051 has a value of 73.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31057

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31057

79.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31057 has a value of 79.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31057 has a value of 79.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (71.8%), 31057 has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31057 has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31058

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31058

73.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31058 has a value of 73.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31058 has a value of 73.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (71.7%), 31058 has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31058 has a value of 73.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31063

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31063

77.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31063 has a value of 77.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31063 has a value of 77.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (71.8%), 31063 has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31063 has a value of 77.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31068

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31068

77.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31068 has a value of 77.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31068 has a value of 77.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (71.8%), 31068 has a value of 77.0% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31068 has a value of 77.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31070

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31070

74.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31070 has a value of 74.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31070 has a value of 74.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), 31070 has a value of 74.4% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31070 has a value of 74.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31091

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31091

75.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31091 has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31091 has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), 31091 has a value of 75.9% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31091 has a value of 75.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31092

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31092

76.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31092 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31092 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), 31092 has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31092 has a value of 76.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31701

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31701

78.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31701 has a value of 78.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31701 has a value of 78.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 31701 has a value of 78.6% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31701 has a value of 78.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31705

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31705

77.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31705 has a value of 77.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31705 has a value of 77.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 31705 has a value of 77.4% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31705 has a value of 77.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31707

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31707

77.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31707 has a value of 77.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31707 has a value of 77.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 31707 has a value of 77.4% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31707 has a value of 77.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31709

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31709

78.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31709 has a value of 78.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31709 has a value of 78.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), 31709 has a value of 78.5% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31709 has a value of 78.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31711

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31711

76.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31711 has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31711 has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), 31711 has a value of 76.0% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31711 has a value of 76.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31716

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31716

76.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31716 has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31716 has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), 31716 has a value of 76.9% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31716 has a value of 76.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31719

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31719

79.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31719 has a value of 79.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31719 has a value of 79.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), 31719 has a value of 79.9% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31719 has a value of 79.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31721

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31721

78.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31721 has a value of 78.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31721 has a value of 78.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 31721 has a value of 78.1% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31721 has a value of 78.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31730

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31730

78.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31730 has a value of 78.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31730 has a value of 78.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), 31730 has a value of 78.0% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31730 has a value of 78.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31735

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31735

76.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31735 has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31735 has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), 31735 has a value of 76.0% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31735 has a value of 76.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31743

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31743

81.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31743 has a value of 81.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31743 has a value of 81.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), 31743 has a value of 81.6% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31743 has a value of 81.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31763

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31763

76.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31763 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31763 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (74.9%), 31763 has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31763 has a value of 76.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31764

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31764

78.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31764 has a value of 78.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31764 has a value of 78.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), 31764 has a value of 78.8% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31764 has a value of 78.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31772

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31772

74.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31772 has a value of 74.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31772 has a value of 74.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), 31772 has a value of 74.4% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31772 has a value of 74.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31779

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31779

76.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31779 has a value of 76.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31779 has a value of 76.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), 31779 has a value of 76.1% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31779 has a value of 76.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31780

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31780

78.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31780 has a value of 78.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31780 has a value of 78.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (74.9%), 31780 has a value of 78.4% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31780 has a value of 78.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31781

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31781

73.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31781 has a value of 73.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31781 has a value of 73.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), 31781 has a value of 73.2% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31781 has a value of 73.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31784

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31784

73.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31784 has a value of 73.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31784 has a value of 73.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (72.1%), 31784 has a value of 73.5% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31784 has a value of 73.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31787

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31787

78.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31787 has a value of 78.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31787 has a value of 78.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (74.9%), 31787 has a value of 78.8% which is higher and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31787 has a value of 78.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31789

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31789

73.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31789 has a value of 73.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31789 has a value of 73.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), 31789 has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31789 has a value of 73.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31791

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31791

75.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31791 has a value of 75.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31791 has a value of 75.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), 31791 has a value of 75.3% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31791 has a value of 75.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31796

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31796

74.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31796 has a value of 74.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31796 has a value of 74.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (70.2%), 31796 has a value of 74.6% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31796 has a value of 74.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31801

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31801

75.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31801 has a value of 75.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31801 has a value of 75.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (71.7%), 31801 has a value of 75.3% which is higher and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31801 has a value of 75.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31803

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31803

76.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31803 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31803 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (71.7%), 31803 has a value of 76.2% which is higher and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31803 has a value of 76.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31806

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31806

76.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31806 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31806 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (71.9%), 31806 has a value of 76.2% which is higher and better.
Schley, GA County Value
(71.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31806 has a value of 76.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31814

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31814

77.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31814 has a value of 77.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31814 has a value of 77.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (72.1%), 31814 has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31814 has a value of 77.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31815

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31815

75.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31815 has a value of 75.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31815 has a value of 75.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (72.1%), 31815 has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31815 has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31821

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31821

74.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31821 has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31821 has a value of 74.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (72.1%), 31821 has a value of 74.0% which is higher and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31821 has a value of 74.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31824

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31824

76.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31824 has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31824 has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (72.1%), 31824 has a value of 76.0% which is higher and better.
Webster, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31824 has a value of 76.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31825

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31825

77.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31825 has a value of 77.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31825 has a value of 77.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (72.1%), 31825 has a value of 77.2% which is higher and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31825 has a value of 77.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31832

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 31832

75.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31832 has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31832 has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (72.1%), 31832 has a value of 75.9% which is higher and better.
Webster, GA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 31832 has a value of 75.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 39826

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 39826

76.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39826 has a value of 76.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39826 has a value of 76.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (72.4%), 39826 has a value of 76.8% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 39826 has a value of 76.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 39842

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 39842

77.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39842 has a value of 77.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39842 has a value of 77.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (72.4%), 39842 has a value of 77.8% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 39842 has a value of 77.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 39877

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 39877

75.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39877 has a value of 75.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39877 has a value of 75.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (72.4%), 39877 has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 39877 has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 39885

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 39885

76.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39885 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 719 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39885 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (72.4%), 39885 has a value of 76.2% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 39885 has a value of 76.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13093970100

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13093970100

76.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970100 has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), 13093970100 has a value of 76.0% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 13093970100 has a value of 76.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13093970200

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13093970200

76.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970200 has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), 13093970200 has a value of 76.9% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 13093970200 has a value of 76.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13093970300

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13093970300

76.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970300 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (72.4%), 13093970300 has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 13093970300 has a value of 76.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000100

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000100

79.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000100 has a value of 79.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 13095000100 has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 13095000100 has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000200

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000200

79.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000200 has a value of 79.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 13095000200 has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 13095000200 has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000400

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000400

76.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000400 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 13095000400 has a value of 76.2% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 13095000400 has a value of 76.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000501

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000501

76.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000501 has a value of 76.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 13095000501 has a value of 76.5% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 13095000501 has a value of 76.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000502

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 13095000502

75.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000502 has a value of 75.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (73.8%), 13095000502 has a value of 75.4% which is higher and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 13095000502 has a value of 75.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)