Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Liquor Store Density County: Marion
Liquor Store Density County: Marion
11.7
Stores per 100,000 population
(2016)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 109 Georgia counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,451 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
GA Value
(9.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
US Value
(10.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Liquor Store Density County: Mitchell
Liquor Store Density County: Mitchell
13.9
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
GA Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 109 Georgia counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
GA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Liquor Store Density County: Schley
Liquor Store Density County: Schley
19.9
Stores per 100,000 population
(2011)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 111 Georgia counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,380 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
GA Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
US Value
(10.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Liquor Store Density County: Sumter
Liquor Store Density County: Sumter
17.1
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
GA Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 109 Georgia counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
GA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Liquor Store Density County: Terrell
Liquor Store Density County: Terrell
34.8
Stores per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
GA Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 109 Georgia counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,456 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
GA Value
(9.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
US Value
(10.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Liquor Store Density County: Worth
Liquor Store Density County: Worth
4.8
Stores per 100,000 population
(2016)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 109 Georgia counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,451 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
GA Value
(9.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
US Value
(10.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Proximity to Highways County: Dooly
Proximity to Highways County: Dooly
2.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Dougherty
Proximity to Highways County: Dougherty
4.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Lee
Proximity to Highways County: Lee
3.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Macon
Proximity to Highways County: Macon
0.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Marion
Proximity to Highways County: Marion
0.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Mitchell
Proximity to Highways County: Mitchell
1.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(1.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Schley
Proximity to Highways County: Schley
1.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Stewart
Proximity to Highways County: Stewart
1.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Sumter
Proximity to Highways County: Sumter
5.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Terrell
Proximity to Highways County: Terrell
2.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Webster
Proximity to Highways County: Webster
2.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Proximity to Highways County: Worth
Proximity to Highways County: Worth
1.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(1.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants
PBT Released County: Dooly
PBT Released County: Dooly
0
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released County: Dougherty
PBT Released County: Dougherty
781
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,142)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released County: Macon
PBT Released County: Macon
751
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,070)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released County: Sumter
PBT Released County: Sumter
1
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released County: Webster
PBT Released County: Webster
10
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released Zip Code: 31068
PBT Released Zip Code: 31068
751
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,070)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released Zip Code: 31092
PBT Released Zip Code: 31092
0
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released Zip Code: 31704
PBT Released Zip Code: 31704
774
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(974)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released Zip Code: 31705
PBT Released Zip Code: 31705
7
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(168)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released Zip Code: 31707
PBT Released Zip Code: 31707
0
Pounds
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released Zip Code: 31709
PBT Released Zip Code: 31709
1
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PBT Released Zip Code: 31824
PBT Released Zip Code: 31824
10
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Weather & Climate
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Dooly
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Dooly
4,257.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,099.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Dougherty
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Dougherty
4,433.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,328.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Lee
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Lee
4,348.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,148.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Macon
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Macon
4,258.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,115.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Marion
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Marion
4,289.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,350.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Mitchell
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Mitchell
4,496.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,383.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Schley
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Schley
4,264.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,248.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Stewart
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Stewart
4,210.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,293.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Sumter
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Sumter
4,354.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,147.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Terrell
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Terrell
4,340.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,418.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Webster
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Webster
4,315.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,442.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Worth
Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Worth
4,385.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
GA Value
(4,168.0)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Prior Value
(4,203.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Dooly
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Dooly
2
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Dougherty
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Dougherty
3
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Lee
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Lee
2
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Macon
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Macon
4
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Marion
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Marion
4
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Mitchell
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Mitchell
3
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Schley
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Schley
4
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Stewart
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Stewart
5
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Sumter
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Sumter
3
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Terrell
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Terrell
2
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Webster
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Webster
4
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(20)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Worth
Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Worth
2
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Dooly
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Dooly
2
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Dougherty
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Dougherty
2
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Lee
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Lee
2
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Macon
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Macon
4
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Marion
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Marion
4
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(14)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Mitchell
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Mitchell
2
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Schley
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Schley
4
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Stewart
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Stewart
4
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(26)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Sumter
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Sumter
3
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Terrell
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Terrell
2
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Webster
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Webster
4
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Worth
Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Worth
2
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Dooly
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Dooly
36
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(29)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Dougherty
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Dougherty
25
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Lee
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Lee
27
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Macon
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Macon
30
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(25)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Marion
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Marion
29
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(25)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Mitchell
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Mitchell
22
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Schley
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Schley
28
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Stewart
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Stewart
15
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Sumter
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Sumter
32
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(25)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Terrell
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Terrell
27
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(25)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Webster
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Webster
21
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Worth
Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Worth
29
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(25)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Dooly
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Dooly
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Dougherty
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Dougherty
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Lee
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Lee
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Macon
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Macon
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Marion
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Marion
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Mitchell
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Mitchell
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Schley
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Schley
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Stewart
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Stewart
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Sumter
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Sumter
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Terrell
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Terrell
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Webster
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Webster
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Worth
Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Worth
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
