Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Dooly Census Tracts
  • County : Dooly Zip Codes
  • County : Dougherty Census Tracts
  • County : Dougherty Zip Codes
  • County : Lee Census Tracts
  • County : Lee Zip Codes
  • County : Macon Census Tracts
  • County : Macon Zip Codes
  • County : Marion Census Tracts
  • County : Marion Zip Codes
  • County : Mitchell Census Tracts
  • County : Mitchell Zip Codes
  • County : Schley Census Tracts
  • County : Schley Zip Codes
  • County : Stewart Census Tracts
  • County : Stewart Zip Codes
  • County : Sumter Census Tracts
  • County : Sumter Zip Codes
  • County : Terrell Census Tracts
  • County : Terrell Zip Codes
  • County : Webster Census Tracts
  • County : Webster Zip Codes
  • County : Worth Census Tracts
  • County : Worth Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000200

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000200

29.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13193000200 has a value of 29.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000200 has a value of 29.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (43.3%), 13193000200 has a value of 29.1% which is lower and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(43.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 13193000200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000300

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000300

26.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13193000300 has a value of 26.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000300 has a value of 26.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (43.3%), 13193000300 has a value of 26.8% which is lower and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(43.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 13193000300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000400

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000400

57.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13193000400 has a value of 57.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000400 has a value of 57.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (43.3%), 13193000400 has a value of 57.6% which is higher and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(43.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 13193000400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13197920100

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13197920100

59.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13197920100 has a value of 59.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13197920100 has a value of 59.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (57.9%), 13197920100 has a value of 59.4% which is higher and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 13197920100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13197920200

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13197920200

56.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13197920200 has a value of 56.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13197920200 has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (57.9%), 13197920200 has a value of 56.2% which is lower and worse.
Marion, GA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 13197920200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090100

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090100

60.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090100 has a value of 60.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090100 has a value of 60.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (50.4%), 13205090100 has a value of 60.4% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090200

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090200

39.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090200 has a value of 39.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090200 has a value of 39.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (50.4%), 13205090200 has a value of 39.9% which is lower and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090300

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090300

33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090300 has a value of 33.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090300 has a value of 33.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (50.4%), 13205090300 has a value of 33.6% which is lower and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090400

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090400

54.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090400 has a value of 54.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090400 has a value of 54.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (47.8%), 13205090400 has a value of 54.6% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(47.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090401

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090401

52.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090401 has a value of 52.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090401 has a value of 52.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (50.4%), 13205090401 has a value of 52.5% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090402

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090402

52.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090402 has a value of 52.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090402 has a value of 52.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (50.4%), 13205090402 has a value of 52.7% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090500

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090500

52.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090500 has a value of 52.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090500 has a value of 52.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (47.8%), 13205090500 has a value of 52.4% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(47.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090501

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090501

45.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090501 has a value of 45.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090501 has a value of 45.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (50.4%), 13205090501 has a value of 45.9% which is lower and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090502

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090502

67.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090502 has a value of 67.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090502 has a value of 67.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (50.4%), 13205090502 has a value of 67.7% which is higher and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13249960100

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13249960100

67.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13249960100 has a value of 67.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13249960100 has a value of 67.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (61.7%), 13249960100 has a value of 67.1% which is higher and better.
Schley, GA County Value
(61.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Over time, the 13249960100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13249960200

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13249960200

55.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13249960200 has a value of 55.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13249960200 has a value of 55.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (61.7%), 13249960200 has a value of 55.7% which is lower and worse.
Schley, GA County Value
(61.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Over time, the 13249960200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13259950100

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13259950100

60.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13259950100 has a value of 60.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13259950100 has a value of 60.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (52.3%), 13259950100 has a value of 60.2% which is higher and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(52.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Over time, the 13259950100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13259950400

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13259950400

43.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13259950400 has a value of 43.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13259950400 has a value of 43.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (52.3%), 13259950400 has a value of 43.3% which is lower and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(52.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Over time, the 13259950400 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950100

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950100

71.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950100 has a value of 71.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950100 has a value of 71.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (52.6%), 13261950100 has a value of 71.4% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950200

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950200

45.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950200 has a value of 45.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950200 has a value of 45.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (52.6%), 13261950200 has a value of 45.3% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950300

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950300

60.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950300 has a value of 60.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950300 has a value of 60.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (52.6%), 13261950300 has a value of 60.5% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950400

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950400

44.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950400 has a value of 44.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950400 has a value of 44.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (52.6%), 13261950400 has a value of 44.0% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950500

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950500

62.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950500 has a value of 62.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950500 has a value of 62.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (52.6%), 13261950500 has a value of 62.7% which is higher and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950600

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950600

41.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950600 has a value of 41.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950600 has a value of 41.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (52.6%), 13261950600 has a value of 41.1% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950700

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950700

48.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950700 has a value of 48.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950700 has a value of 48.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (52.6%), 13261950700 has a value of 48.5% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950800

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950800

50.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950800 has a value of 50.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950800 has a value of 50.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (52.6%), 13261950800 has a value of 50.1% which is lower and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120200

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120200

65.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13273120200 has a value of 65.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120200 has a value of 65.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (51.4%), 13273120200 has a value of 65.1% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 13273120200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120300

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120300

35.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13273120300 has a value of 35.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120300 has a value of 35.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (51.4%), 13273120300 has a value of 35.7% which is lower and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 13273120300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120400

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120400

53.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13273120400 has a value of 53.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120400 has a value of 53.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (51.4%), 13273120400 has a value of 53.2% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 13273120400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120500

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120500

69.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13273120500 has a value of 69.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120500 has a value of 69.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (51.4%), 13273120500 has a value of 69.9% which is higher and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 13273120500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13307960100

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13307960100

42.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13307960100 has a value of 42.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960100 has a value of 42.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (53.9%), 13307960100 has a value of 42.8% which is lower and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Over time, the 13307960100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13307960200

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13307960200

64.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13307960200 has a value of 64.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960200 has a value of 64.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (53.9%), 13307960200 has a value of 64.2% which is higher and better.
Webster, GA County Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Over time, the 13307960200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950100

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950100

64.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950100 has a value of 64.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950100 has a value of 64.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (62.2%), 13321950100 has a value of 64.7% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950200

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950200

63.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950200 has a value of 63.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950200 has a value of 63.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (60.9%), 13321950200 has a value of 63.3% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(60.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950201

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950201

59.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950201 has a value of 59.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950201 has a value of 59.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (62.2%), 13321950201 has a value of 59.0% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950202

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950202

54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950202 has a value of 54.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950202 has a value of 54.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (62.2%), 13321950202 has a value of 54.4% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950400

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950400

61.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950400 has a value of 61.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950400 has a value of 61.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (62.2%), 13321950400 has a value of 61.8% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950500

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950500

60.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950500 has a value of 60.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950500 has a value of 60.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (62.2%), 13321950500 has a value of 60.3% which is lower and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950600

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950600

80.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950600 has a value of 80.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950600 has a value of 80.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (62.2%), 13321950600 has a value of 80.3% which is higher and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Albany

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Albany

29.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Albany has a value of 29.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albany has a value of 29.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), Albany has a value of 29.6% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Albany has a value of 29.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Albany has a value of 29.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albany value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Americus

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Americus

27.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Americus has a value of 27.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Americus has a value of 27.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), Americus has a value of 27.1% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Americus has a value of 27.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Americus has a value of 27.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Americus value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Andersonville

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Andersonville

26.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 26.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 26.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), Andersonville has a value of 26.5% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Andersonville has a value of 26.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Andersonville has a value of 26.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Andersonville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Baconton

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Baconton

13.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Baconton has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Baconton has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), Baconton has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Baconton has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Baconton has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Baconton value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Bronwood

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Bronwood

28.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 28.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 28.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), Bronwood has a value of 28.2% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Bronwood has a value of 28.2% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Bronwood has a value of 28.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bronwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Buena Vista

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Buena Vista

22.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 22.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 22.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (12.4%), Buena Vista has a value of 22.6% which is higher and worse.
Marion, GA County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Buena Vista has a value of 22.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Buena Vista has a value of 22.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Buena Vista value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Byromville

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Byromville

9.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Byromville has a value of 9.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Byromville has a value of 9.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), Byromville has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Byromville has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Byromville has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Byromville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Camilla

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Camilla

46.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Camilla has a value of 46.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camilla has a value of 46.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), Camilla has a value of 46.7% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Camilla has a value of 46.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Camilla has a value of 46.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Camilla value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Dawson

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Dawson

47.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dawson has a value of 47.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dawson has a value of 47.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), Dawson has a value of 47.0% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Dawson has a value of 47.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Dawson has a value of 47.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dawson value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): De Soto

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): De Soto

47.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, De Soto has a value of 47.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, De Soto has a value of 47.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), De Soto has a value of 47.8% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), De Soto has a value of 47.8% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), De Soto has a value of 47.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the De Soto value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Dooling

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Dooling

39.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dooling has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dooling has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), Dooling has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Dooling has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Dooling has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dooling value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Ellaville

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Ellaville

20.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 20.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 20.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (15.9%), Ellaville has a value of 20.3% which is higher and worse.
Schley, GA County Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Ellaville has a value of 20.3% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Ellaville has a value of 20.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ellaville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Ideal

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Ideal

62.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ideal has a value of 62.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ideal has a value of 62.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), Ideal has a value of 62.5% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Ideal has a value of 62.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Ideal has a value of 62.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ideal value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Leesburg

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Leesburg

25.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 25.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 25.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), Leesburg has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Leesburg has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Leesburg has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leesburg value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Leslie

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Leslie

37.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leslie has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leslie has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), Leslie has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Leslie has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Leslie has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leslie value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Lilly

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Lilly

32.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lilly has a value of 32.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lilly has a value of 32.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), Lilly has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Lilly has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Lilly has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lilly value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Lumpkin

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Lumpkin

25.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 25.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 25.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (21.9%), Lumpkin has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Lumpkin has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Lumpkin has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lumpkin value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Marshallville

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Marshallville

41.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 41.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 41.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), Marshallville has a value of 41.6% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Marshallville has a value of 41.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Marshallville has a value of 41.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Marshallville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Meigs

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Meigs

42.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Meigs has a value of 42.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meigs has a value of 42.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), Meigs has a value of 42.1% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Meigs has a value of 42.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Meigs has a value of 42.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Meigs value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Montezuma

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Montezuma

17.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), Montezuma has a value of 17.7% which is lower and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Montezuma has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Montezuma has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Montezuma value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

32.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 32.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 32.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), Oglethorpe has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Oglethorpe has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Oglethorpe has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oglethorpe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Parrott

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Parrott

10.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Parrott has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Parrott has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), Parrott has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Parrott has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Parrott has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Parrott value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Pelham

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Pelham

32.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pelham has a value of 32.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pelham has a value of 32.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), Pelham has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Pelham has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Pelham has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pelham value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Pinehurst

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Pinehurst

41.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 41.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 41.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), Pinehurst has a value of 41.7% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Pinehurst has a value of 41.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Pinehurst has a value of 41.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pinehurst value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Plains

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Plains

9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Plains has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Plains has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), Plains has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Plains has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Plains has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Plains value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Poulan

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Poulan

17.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Poulan has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Poulan has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), Poulan has a value of 17.6% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Poulan has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Poulan has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Poulan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Putney

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Putney

19.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Putney has a value of 19.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Putney has a value of 19.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), Putney has a value of 19.5% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Putney has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Putney has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Putney value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Richland

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Richland

19.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Richland has a value of 19.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Richland has a value of 19.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (21.9%), Richland has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Richland has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Richland has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Richland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Sale City

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Sale City

24.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sale City has a value of 24.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sale City has a value of 24.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), Sale City has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Sale City has a value of 24.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sale City has a value of 24.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sale City value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Sasser

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Sasser

12.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sasser has a value of 12.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sasser has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), Sasser has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Sasser has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sasser has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sasser value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Smithville

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Smithville

13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Smithville has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Smithville has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), Smithville has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Smithville has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Smithville has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Smithville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Sumner

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Sumner

22.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sumner has a value of 22.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sumner has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), Sumner has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Sumner has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sumner has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sumner value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Sylvester

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Sylvester

28.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 28.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 28.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), Sylvester has a value of 28.3% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Sylvester has a value of 28.3% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sylvester has a value of 28.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sylvester value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Unadilla

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Unadilla

16.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 16.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 16.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), Unadilla has a value of 16.7% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Unadilla has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Unadilla has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Unadilla value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Vienna

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Vienna

35.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Vienna has a value of 35.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Vienna has a value of 35.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), Vienna has a value of 35.5% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Vienna has a value of 35.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Vienna has a value of 35.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Vienna value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Warwick

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Warwick

18.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Warwick has a value of 18.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warwick has a value of 18.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), Warwick has a value of 18.9% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Warwick has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Warwick has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warwick value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Webster County

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Webster County

27.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Webster County has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 617 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Webster County has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (27.9%), Webster County has a value of 27.9%.
Webster, GA County Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Webster County has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Webster County has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Webster County value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Dooly

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Dooly

21.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 21.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 21.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Dooly has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Dooly has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dooly value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Dougherty

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Dougherty

26.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 26.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 26.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Dougherty has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Dougherty has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dougherty value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Lee

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Lee

8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Lee has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Lee has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lee value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Macon

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Macon

26.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 26.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 26.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Macon has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Macon has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Macon value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Marion

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Marion

12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Marion has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Marion has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Marion value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Mitchell

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Mitchell

28.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 28.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 28.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Mitchell has a value of 28.7% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Mitchell has a value of 28.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mitchell value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Schley

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Schley

15.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Schley has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Schley has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Schley has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Schley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Stewart

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Stewart

21.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 21.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Stewart has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Stewart has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Stewart value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Sumter

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Sumter

24.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 24.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 24.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Sumter has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sumter has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sumter value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Terrell

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Terrell

29.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 29.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 29.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Terrell has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Terrell has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Terrell value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Webster

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Webster

27.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Webster has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Webster has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Webster has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Webster value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Worth

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Worth

19.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 19.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (13.5%), Worth has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Worth has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Worth value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31007

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31007

11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31007 has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31007 has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), 31007 has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31007 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31041

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31041

56.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31041 has a value of 56.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31041 has a value of 56.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), 31041 has a value of 56.0% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 31041 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31051

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31051

40.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31051 has a value of 40.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31051 has a value of 40.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), 31051 has a value of 40.9% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31051 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31057

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31057

29.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31057 has a value of 29.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31057 has a value of 29.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), 31057 has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 31057 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31058

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31058

36.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31058 has a value of 36.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31058 has a value of 36.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (12.4%), 31058 has a value of 36.0% which is higher and worse.
Marion, GA County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 31058 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31063

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31063

15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31063 has a value of 15.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31063 has a value of 15.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), 31063 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 31063 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31068

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31068

35.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31068 has a value of 35.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31068 has a value of 35.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), 31068 has a value of 35.5% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 31068 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31070

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31070

21.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31070 has a value of 21.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31070 has a value of 21.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), 31070 has a value of 21.1% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31070 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31091

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31091

9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31091 has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31091 has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), 31091 has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31091 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31092

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31092

27.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31092 has a value of 27.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31092 has a value of 27.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), 31092 has a value of 27.3% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31092 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31701

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31701

32.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31701 has a value of 32.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31701 has a value of 32.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 31701 has a value of 32.8% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 31701 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31705

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31705

33.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31705 has a value of 33.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31705 has a value of 33.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 31705 has a value of 33.0% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 31705 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31707

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31707

23.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31707 has a value of 23.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31707 has a value of 23.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 31707 has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 31707 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31709

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31709

25.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31709 has a value of 25.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31709 has a value of 25.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 31709 has a value of 25.4% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31709 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31711

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31711

24.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31711 has a value of 24.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31711 has a value of 24.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 31711 has a value of 24.4% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31711 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31716

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31716

21.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31716 has a value of 21.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31716 has a value of 21.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 31716 has a value of 21.3% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 31716 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31719

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31719

20.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31719 has a value of 20.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31719 has a value of 20.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 31719 has a value of 20.9% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31719 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31721

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31721

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31721 has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31721 has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 31721 has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 31721 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31730

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31730

32.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31730 has a value of 32.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31730 has a value of 32.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 31730 has a value of 32.5% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 31730 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31735

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31735

36.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31735 has a value of 36.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31735 has a value of 36.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 31735 has a value of 36.4% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31735 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31743

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31743

27.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31743 has a value of 27.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31743 has a value of 27.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 31743 has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31743 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31763

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31763

9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31763 has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31763 has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 31763 has a value of 9.6% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 31763 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31764

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31764

14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31764 has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31764 has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 31764 has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31764 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31772

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31772

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31772 has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31772 has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 31772 has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31772 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31779

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31779

29.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31779 has a value of 29.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31779 has a value of 29.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 31779 has a value of 29.9% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 31779 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31780

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31780

21.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31780 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31780 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 31780 has a value of 21.7% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31780 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31781

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31781

36.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31781 has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31781 has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 31781 has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31781 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31784

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31784

12.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31784 has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31784 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 31784 has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 31784 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31787

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31787

15.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31787 has a value of 15.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31787 has a value of 15.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 31787 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 31787 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31789

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31789

12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31789 has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31789 has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 31789 has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31789 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31791

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31791

20.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31791 has a value of 20.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31791 has a value of 20.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 31791 has a value of 20.9% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31791 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31796

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31796

12.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31796 has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31796 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 31796 has a value of 12.1% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31796 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31801

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31801

17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31801 has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31801 has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (12.4%), 31801 has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
Marion, GA County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 31801 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31803

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31803

12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31803 has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31803 has a value of 12.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (12.4%), 31803 has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 31803 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31806

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31806

15.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31806 has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31806 has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (15.9%), 31806 has a value of 15.9%.
Schley, GA County Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Over time, the 31806 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31814

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31814

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31814 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 716 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31814 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,412 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (28.2%), 31814 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(28.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Over time, the 31814 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31815

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31815

32.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31815 has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31815 has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (21.9%), 31815 has a value of 32.0% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Over time, the 31815 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31821

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31821

45.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31821 has a value of 45.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31821 has a value of 45.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (21.9%), 31821 has a value of 45.0% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Over time, the 31821 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31824

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31824

29.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31824 has a value of 29.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31824 has a value of 29.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (27.9%), 31824 has a value of 29.1% which is higher and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Over time, the 31824 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31825

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31825

19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31825 has a value of 19.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31825 has a value of 19.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (21.9%), 31825 has a value of 19.2% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Over time, the 31825 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31832

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 31832

36.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31832 has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31832 has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (27.9%), 31832 has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Over time, the 31832 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 39826

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 39826

15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39826 has a value of 15.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39826 has a value of 15.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), 39826 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 39826 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 39842

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 39842

33.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39842 has a value of 33.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39842 has a value of 33.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), 39842 has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 39842 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 39877

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 39877

6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39877 has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39877 has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), 39877 has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 39877 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 39885

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 39885

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39885 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 721 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39885 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,753 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), 39885 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 39885 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13093970100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13093970100

13.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13093970100 has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970100 has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), 13093970100 has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 13093970100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13093970200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13093970200

21.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13093970200 has a value of 21.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970200 has a value of 21.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), 13093970200 has a value of 21.2% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 13093970200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13093970300

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13093970300

25.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13093970300 has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970300 has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (21.0%), 13093970300 has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 13093970300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000100

37.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000100 has a value of 37.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000100 has a value of 37.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (28.4%), 13095000100 has a value of 37.1% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000101

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000101

62.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000101 has a value of 62.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000101 has a value of 62.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000101 has a value of 62.9% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000102

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000102

40.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000102 has a value of 40.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000102 has a value of 40.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000102 has a value of 40.6% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000200

52.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000200 has a value of 52.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000200 has a value of 52.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000200 has a value of 52.4% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000400

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000400

17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000400 has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000400 has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000400 has a value of 17.1% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000400 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000501

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000501

7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000501 has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000501 has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000501 has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000501 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000502

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000502

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000502 has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000502 has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000502 has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000502 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000600

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000600

26.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000600 has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000600 has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000600 has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000700

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000700

23.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000700 has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000700 has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000700 has a value of 23.6% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000800

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000800

47.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000800 has a value of 47.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000800 has a value of 47.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000800 has a value of 47.6% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000800 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000900

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095000900

21.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095000900 has a value of 21.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000900 has a value of 21.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095000900 has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095000900 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095001000

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095001000

41.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095001000 has a value of 41.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095001000 has a value of 41.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095001000 has a value of 41.8% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095001000 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095001100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095001100

41.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095001100 has a value of 41.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095001100 has a value of 41.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095001100 has a value of 41.7% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095001100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095001403

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095001403

51.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095001403 has a value of 51.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095001403 has a value of 51.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095001403 has a value of 51.6% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095001403 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)