Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Dooly Census Tracts
  • County : Dooly Zip Codes
  • County : Dougherty Census Tracts
  • County : Dougherty Zip Codes
  • County : Lee Census Tracts
  • County : Lee Zip Codes
  • County : Macon Census Tracts
  • County : Macon Zip Codes
  • County : Marion Census Tracts
  • County : Marion Zip Codes
  • County : Mitchell Census Tracts
  • County : Mitchell Zip Codes
  • County : Schley Census Tracts
  • County : Schley Zip Codes
  • County : Stewart Census Tracts
  • County : Stewart Zip Codes
  • County : Sumter Census Tracts
  • County : Sumter Zip Codes
  • County : Terrell Census Tracts
  • County : Terrell Zip Codes
  • County : Webster Census Tracts
  • County : Webster Zip Codes
  • County : Worth Census Tracts
  • County : Worth Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095001500

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095001500

41.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095001500 has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095001500 has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095001500 has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095001500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010302

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010302

32.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010302 has a value of 32.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010302 has a value of 32.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010302 has a value of 32.5% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010302 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010401

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010401

5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010401 has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010401 has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010401 has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010401 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010402

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010402

20.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010402 has a value of 20.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010402 has a value of 20.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010402 has a value of 20.7% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010402 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010403

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010403

7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010403 has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010403 has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010403 has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010403 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010500

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010500

13.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010500 has a value of 13.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010500 has a value of 13.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010500 has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010601

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010601

38.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010601 has a value of 38.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010601 has a value of 38.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010601 has a value of 38.8% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010601 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010602

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010602

22.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010602 has a value of 22.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010602 has a value of 22.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010602 has a value of 22.5% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010602 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010700

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010700

45.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010700 has a value of 45.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010700 has a value of 45.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (28.4%), 13095010700 has a value of 45.8% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010701

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010701

46.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010701 has a value of 46.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010701 has a value of 46.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010701 has a value of 46.0% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010702

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010702

43.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010702 has a value of 43.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010702 has a value of 43.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010702 has a value of 43.3% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010900

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095010900

26.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095010900 has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095010900 has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095010900 has a value of 26.1% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095010900 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011000

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011000

19.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095011000 has a value of 19.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011000 has a value of 19.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095011000 has a value of 19.5% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095011000 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011200

34.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095011200 has a value of 34.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011200 has a value of 34.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095011200 has a value of 34.1% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095011200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011300

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011300

23.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095011300 has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011300 has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095011300 has a value of 23.6% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095011300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011400

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011400

47.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095011400 has a value of 47.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011400 has a value of 47.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095011400 has a value of 47.5% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095011400 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011600

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13095011600

8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13095011600 has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095011600 has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (26.4%), 13095011600 has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 13095011600 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020100

9.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020100 has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020100 has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (12.8%), 13177020100 has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 13177020100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020101

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020101

7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020101 has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020101 has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 13177020101 has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020102

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020102

2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020102 has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020102 has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 13177020102 has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020200

6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020200 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020200 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 13177020200 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 13177020200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020300

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020300

17.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020300 has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020300 has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (12.8%), 13177020300 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 13177020300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020301

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020301

18.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020301 has a value of 18.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020301 has a value of 18.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 13177020301 has a value of 18.7% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020302

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020302

9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020302 has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020302 has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 13177020302 has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020402

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020402

15.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020402 has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020402 has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (12.8%), 13177020402 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 13177020402 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020403

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020403

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020403 has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020403 has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 13177020403 has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 13177020403 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020404

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020404

13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020404 has a value of 13.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020404 has a value of 13.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 13177020404 has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020405

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13177020405

10.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13177020405 has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13177020405 has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (8.8%), 13177020405 has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000100

30.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13193000100 has a value of 30.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000100 has a value of 30.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), 13193000100 has a value of 30.8% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 13193000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000200

43.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13193000200 has a value of 43.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000200 has a value of 43.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), 13193000200 has a value of 43.2% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 13193000200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000300

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000300

34.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13193000300 has a value of 34.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000300 has a value of 34.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), 13193000300 has a value of 34.1% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 13193000300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000400

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13193000400

14.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13193000400 has a value of 14.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13193000400 has a value of 14.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (26.2%), 13193000400 has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 13193000400 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13197920100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13197920100

10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13197920100 has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13197920100 has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (12.4%), 13197920100 has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 13197920100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13197920200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13197920200

15.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13197920200 has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13197920200 has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (12.4%), 13197920200 has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
Marion, GA County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 13197920200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090100

16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090100 has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090100 has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 13205090100 has a value of 16.2% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090200

30.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090200 has a value of 30.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090200 has a value of 30.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 13205090200 has a value of 30.6% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090300

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090300

44.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090300 has a value of 44.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090300 has a value of 44.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 13205090300 has a value of 44.9% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090400

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090400

21.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090400 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090400 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (23.1%), 13205090400 has a value of 21.7% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090401

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090401

36.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090401 has a value of 36.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090401 has a value of 36.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 13205090401 has a value of 36.4% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090402

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090402

32.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090402 has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090402 has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 13205090402 has a value of 32.0% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090500

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090500

18.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090500 has a value of 18.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090500 has a value of 18.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (23.1%), 13205090500 has a value of 18.2% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 13205090500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090501

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090501

25.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090501 has a value of 25.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090501 has a value of 25.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 13205090501 has a value of 25.6% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090502

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13205090502

20.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13205090502 has a value of 20.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13205090502 has a value of 20.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (28.7%), 13205090502 has a value of 20.6% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(28.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13249960100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13249960100

17.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13249960100 has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13249960100 has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (15.9%), 13249960100 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
Schley, GA County Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Over time, the 13249960100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13249960200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13249960200

14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13249960200 has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13249960200 has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (15.9%), 13249960200 has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
Schley, GA County Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Over time, the 13249960200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13259950100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13259950100

13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13259950100 has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13259950100 has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (21.9%), 13259950100 has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Over time, the 13259950100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13259950400

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13259950400

31.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13259950400 has a value of 31.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13259950400 has a value of 31.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (21.9%), 13259950400 has a value of 31.7% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Over time, the 13259950400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950100

12.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950100 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950100 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 13261950100 has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950200

32.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950200 has a value of 32.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950200 has a value of 32.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 13261950200 has a value of 32.1% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950300

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950300

19.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950300 has a value of 19.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950300 has a value of 19.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 13261950300 has a value of 19.7% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950300 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950400

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950400

27.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950400 has a value of 27.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950400 has a value of 27.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 13261950400 has a value of 27.5% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950500

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950500

12.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950500 has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950500 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 13261950500 has a value of 12.1% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950500 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950600

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950600

28.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950600 has a value of 28.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950600 has a value of 28.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 13261950600 has a value of 28.9% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950700

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950700

25.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950700 has a value of 25.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950700 has a value of 25.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 13261950700 has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950700 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950800

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13261950800

34.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13261950800 has a value of 34.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950800 has a value of 34.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (24.2%), 13261950800 has a value of 34.9% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 13261950800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120200

10.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13273120200 has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120200 has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), 13273120200 has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 13273120200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120300

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120300

46.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13273120300 has a value of 46.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120300 has a value of 46.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), 13273120300 has a value of 46.3% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 13273120300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120400

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120400

33.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13273120400 has a value of 33.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120400 has a value of 33.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), 13273120400 has a value of 33.4% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 13273120400 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120500

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13273120500

6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13273120500 has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120500 has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (29.8%), 13273120500 has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Over time, the 13273120500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13307960100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13307960100

27.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13307960100 has a value of 27.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960100 has a value of 27.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (27.9%), 13307960100 has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.
Webster, GA County Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Over time, the 13307960100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13307960200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13307960200

28.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13307960200 has a value of 28.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960200 has a value of 28.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (27.9%), 13307960200 has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Over time, the 13307960200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950100

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950100

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950100 has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950100 has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 13321950100 has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950200

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950200

29.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950200 has a value of 29.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950200 has a value of 29.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,257 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.0%), 13321950200 has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950201

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950201

21.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950201 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950201 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 13321950201 has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950202

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950202

35.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950202 has a value of 35.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950202 has a value of 35.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 13321950202 has a value of 35.0% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950400

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950400

22.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950400 has a value of 22.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950400 has a value of 22.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 13321950400 has a value of 22.9% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950500

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950500

17.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950500 has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950500 has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 13321950500 has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950600

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 13321950600

4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Tracts, 13321950600 has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
GA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,783 Georgia census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950600 has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,546 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (19.6%), 13321950600 has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 13321950600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

Economy / Poverty

Youth not in School or Working

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Youth not in School or Working

Value
Compared to:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Albany

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Albany

5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Albany has a value of 5.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albany has a value of 5.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (5.0%), Albany has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Albany has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Albany has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albany value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Americus

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Americus

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Americus has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Americus has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), Americus has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Americus has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Americus has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Americus value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Andersonville

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Andersonville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), Andersonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Andersonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Andersonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Andersonville value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Baconton

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Baconton

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Baconton has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Baconton has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), Baconton has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Baconton has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Baconton has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Baconton value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Bronwood

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Bronwood

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (0.0%), Bronwood has a value of 0.0%.
Terrell, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Bronwood has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Bronwood has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bronwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Buena Vista

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Buena Vista

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (1.0%), Buena Vista has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Buena Vista has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Buena Vista has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Buena Vista value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Byromville

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Byromville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Byromville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Byromville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), Byromville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Byromville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Byromville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Byromville value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Camilla

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Camilla

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Camilla has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camilla has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), Camilla has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Camilla has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Camilla has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Camilla value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Dawson

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Dawson

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dawson has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dawson has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (0.0%), Dawson has a value of 0.0%.
Terrell, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Dawson has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Dawson has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dawson value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): De Soto

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): De Soto

0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (8.7%), De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (7.8%), De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.9%), De Soto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the De Soto value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Dooling

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Dooling

0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dooling has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dooling has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (18.9%), Dooling has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (7.8%), Dooling has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.9%), Dooling has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dooling value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Ellaville

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Ellaville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (0.0%), Ellaville has a value of 0.0%.
Schley, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Ellaville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Ellaville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ellaville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Ideal

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Ideal

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ideal has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ideal has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (0.0%), Ideal has a value of 0.0%.
Macon, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Ideal has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Ideal has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Leesburg

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Leesburg

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (0.0%), Leesburg has a value of 0.3% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Leesburg has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Leesburg has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leesburg value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Leslie

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Leslie

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leslie has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leslie has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), Leslie has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Leslie has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Leslie has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leslie value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Lilly

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Lilly

26.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lilly has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lilly has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), Lilly has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Lilly has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Lilly has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lilly value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Lumpkin

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Lumpkin

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (23.1%), Lumpkin has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Lumpkin has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Lumpkin has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lumpkin value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Marshallville

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Marshallville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (0.0%), Marshallville has a value of 0.0%.
Macon, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Marshallville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Marshallville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Marshallville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Meigs

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Meigs

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Meigs has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meigs has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), Meigs has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Meigs has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Meigs has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Meigs value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Montezuma

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Montezuma

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (0.0%), Montezuma has a value of 0.0%.
Macon, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Montezuma has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Montezuma has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Montezuma value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (0.0%), Oglethorpe has a value of 0.0%.
Macon, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Oglethorpe has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Oglethorpe has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oglethorpe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Parrott

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Parrott

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Parrott has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Parrott has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (0.0%), Parrott has a value of 0.0%.
Terrell, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Parrott has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Parrott has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Pelham

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Pelham

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pelham has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pelham has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), Pelham has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Pelham has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Pelham has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pelham value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Pinehurst

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Pinehurst

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), Pinehurst has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Pinehurst has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Pinehurst has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pinehurst value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Plains

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Plains

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Plains has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Plains has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), Plains has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Plains has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Plains has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Plains value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Poulan

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Poulan

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Poulan has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Poulan has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (4.0%), Poulan has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Poulan has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Poulan has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Poulan value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Putney

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Putney

21.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Putney has a value of 21.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Putney has a value of 21.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (5.0%), Putney has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Putney has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Putney has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Putney value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Richland

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Richland

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Richland has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Richland has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (23.1%), Richland has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Richland has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Richland has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Richland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Sale City

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Sale City

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sale City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sale City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), Sale City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Sale City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Sale City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sale City value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Sasser

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Sasser

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (0.0%), Sasser has a value of 0.0%.
Terrell, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Sasser has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sasser value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Smithville

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Smithville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (0.0%), Smithville has a value of 0.0%.
Lee, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Smithville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Sumner

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Sumner

5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sumner has a value of 5.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sumner has a value of 5.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (4.0%), Sumner has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Sumner has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Sumner has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sumner value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Sylvester

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Sylvester

5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 5.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 5.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (4.0%), Sylvester has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Sylvester has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Sylvester has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sylvester value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Unadilla

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Unadilla

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), Unadilla has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Unadilla has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Unadilla has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Unadilla value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Vienna

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Vienna

22.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Vienna has a value of 22.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Vienna has a value of 22.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), Vienna has a value of 22.6% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Vienna has a value of 22.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Vienna has a value of 22.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Vienna value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Warwick

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Warwick

58.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Warwick has a value of 58.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warwick has a value of 58.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (4.0%), Warwick has a value of 58.6% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Warwick has a value of 58.6% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Warwick has a value of 58.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warwick value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Webster County

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place (City): Webster County

46.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Webster County has a value of 46.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
GA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 589 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Webster County has a value of 46.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (46.5%), Webster County has a value of 46.5%.
Webster, GA County Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Webster County has a value of 46.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Webster County has a value of 46.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Webster County value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Dooly

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Dooly

9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 9.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 9.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Dooly has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Dooly has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dooly value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Dougherty

5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Dougherty has a value of 5.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Dougherty has a value of 5.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dougherty value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Lee

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Lee

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Lee has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Lee has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lee value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Macon

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Macon

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Macon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Macon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Macon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Marion

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Marion

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Marion has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Marion has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Marion value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Mitchell

8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 8.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 8.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Mitchell has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Mitchell has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mitchell value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Schley

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Schley

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Schley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Schley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Schley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Schley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Stewart

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Stewart

23.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 23.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 23.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Stewart has a value of 23.1% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Stewart has a value of 23.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Stewart value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Sumter

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Sumter

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 1.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 1.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Sumter has a value of 1.8%.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Sumter has a value of 1.8%.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sumter value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Terrell

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Terrell

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Terrell has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Terrell has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Terrell value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Webster

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Webster

46.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 46.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Webster has a value of 46.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Webster has a value of 46.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Webster has a value of 46.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Webster value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working County: Worth

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Worth

4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (1.8%), Worth has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Worth has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Worth value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31007

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31007

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31007 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31007 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), 31007 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31007 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31041

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31041

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31041 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31041 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (0.0%), 31041 has a value of 0.0%.
Macon, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 31041 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31051

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31051

26.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31051 has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31051 has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), 31051 has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31051 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31057

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31057

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31057 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31057 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (0.0%), 31057 has a value of 0.0%.
Macon, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 31057 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31058

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31058

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31058 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31058 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (1.0%), 31058 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 31058 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31063

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31063

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31063 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31063 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (0.0%), 31063 has a value of 0.0%.
Macon, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 31063 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31068

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31068

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31068 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31068 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (0.0%), 31068 has a value of 0.0%.
Macon, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Over time, the 31068 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31070

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31070

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31070 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31070 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), 31070 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31070 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31091

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31091

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31091 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31091 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), 31091 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31091 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31092

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31092

14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31092 has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31092 has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (9.2%), 31092 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
Dooly, GA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Over time, the 31092 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31701

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31701

4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31701 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31701 has a value of 4.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (5.0%), 31701 has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 31701 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31704

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31704

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31704 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31704 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (5.0%), 31704 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31705

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31705

5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31705 has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31705 has a value of 5.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (5.0%), 31705 has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 31705 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31707

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31707

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31707 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31707 has a value of 5.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (5.0%), 31707 has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 31707 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31709

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31709

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31709 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31709 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), 31709 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31709 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31711

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31711

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31711 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31711 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), 31711 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31711 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31716

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31716

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31716 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31716 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), 31716 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 31716 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31719

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31719

7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31719 has a value of 7.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31719 has a value of 7.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), 31719 has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31719 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31721

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31721

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31721 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31721 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (5.0%), 31721 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Over time, the 31721 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31730

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31730

11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31730 has a value of 11.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31730 has a value of 11.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), 31730 has a value of 11.4% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 31730 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31743

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31743

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31743 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31743 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), 31743 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31743 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31763

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31763

0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31763 has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31763 has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (0.0%), 31763 has a value of 0.1% which is higher and worse.
Lee, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 31763 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31764

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31764

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31764 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31764 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), 31764 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31764 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31772

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31772

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31772 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.3%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 694 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31772 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 29,859 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (18.2%), 31772 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31779

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31779

6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31779 has a value of 6.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31779 has a value of 6.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), 31779 has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 31779 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31780

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31780

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31780 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31780 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (1.8%), 31780 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Over time, the 31780 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31781

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31781

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31781 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31781 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (4.0%), 31781 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31781 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31784

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31784

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31784 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31784 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (8.1%), 31784 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Over time, the 31784 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31787

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31787

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31787 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31787 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (0.0%), 31787 has a value of 0.0%.
Lee, GA County Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Over time, the 31787 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31789

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31789

3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31789 has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31789 has a value of 3.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (4.0%), 31789 has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31789 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31791

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31791

3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31791 has a value of 3.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31791 has a value of 3.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (4.0%), 31791 has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31791 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31796

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31796

58.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31796 has a value of 58.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31796 has a value of 58.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (4.0%), 31796 has a value of 58.6% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Over time, the 31796 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31801

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Zip Code: 31801

18.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31801 has a value of 18.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
GA Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 691 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31801 has a value of 18.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 29,979 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (1.0%), 31801 has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
Marion, GA County Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Over time, the 31801 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.