Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Dooly Census Tracts
  • County : Dooly Zip Codes
  • County : Dougherty Census Tracts
  • County : Dougherty Zip Codes
  • County : Lee Census Tracts
  • County : Lee Zip Codes
  • County : Macon Census Tracts
  • County : Macon Zip Codes
  • County : Marion Census Tracts
  • County : Marion Zip Codes
  • County : Mitchell Census Tracts
  • County : Mitchell Zip Codes
  • County : Schley Census Tracts
  • County : Schley Zip Codes
  • County : Stewart Census Tracts
  • County : Stewart Zip Codes
  • County : Sumter Census Tracts
  • County : Sumter Zip Codes
  • County : Terrell Census Tracts
  • County : Terrell Zip Codes
  • County : Webster Census Tracts
  • County : Webster Zip Codes
  • County : Worth Census Tracts
  • County : Worth Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13261950700

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13261950700

13.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950700 has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (12.6%), 13261950700 has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13261950700 has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13261950800

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13261950800

13.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13261950800 has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (12.6%), 13261950800 has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13261950800 has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13273120200

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13273120200

12.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120200 has a value of 12.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (11.3%), 13273120200 has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13273120200 has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13273120300

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13273120300

11.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120300 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (11.3%), 13273120300 has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13273120300 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13273120400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13273120400

11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120400 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (11.3%), 13273120400 has a value of 11.3%.
Terrell, GA County Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13273120400 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13273120500

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13273120500

14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13273120500 has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (11.3%), 13273120500 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13273120500 has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13307960100

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13307960100

13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960100 has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (11.2%), 13307960100 has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13307960100 has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13307960200

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13307960200

13.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13307960200 has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (11.2%), 13307960200 has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13307960200 has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950100

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950100

14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950100 has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (13.3%), 13321950100 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13321950100 has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950200

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950200

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950200 has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (13.3%), 13321950200 has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13321950200 has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950400

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950400 has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (13.3%), 13321950400 has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13321950400 has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950500

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950500

14.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950500 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (13.3%), 13321950500 has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13321950500 has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 13321950600

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13321950600 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (13.3%), 13321950600 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Worth, GA County Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 13321950600 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Drink Excessively

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Drink Excessively

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Dooly

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Dooly

13.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Dooly has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Dooly has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dooly (13.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.3%).
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dooly value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Dougherty

13.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Dougherty has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Dougherty has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (13.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Lee

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Lee

17.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 17.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 17.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Lee has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Lee has a value of 17.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (17.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Macon

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Macon

12.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Macon has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Macon has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Macon (12.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Macon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Marion

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Marion

13.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Marion has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Marion has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Marion (13.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Marion value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Mitchell

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Mitchell has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Mitchell has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (13.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.5%).
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Schley

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Schley

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Schley has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Schley has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Schley has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Schley (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.1%).
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Schley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Stewart

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Stewart

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 16.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Stewart has a value of 16.3% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Stewart has a value of 16.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Stewart (16.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.7%).
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Stewart value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Sumter

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Sumter

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Sumter has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Sumter has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (13.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.7%).
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Terrell

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Terrell

12.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Terrell has a value of 12.1% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Terrell has a value of 12.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Terrell (12.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.5%).
Prior Value
(13.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Terrell value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Webster

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Webster

12.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Webster has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Webster has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Webster has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Webster (12.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Webster value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Worth

Current Value:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Worth

14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (16.6%), Worth has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
GA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Worth has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (14.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.8%).
Prior Value
(16.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Dougherty

26.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (18.4), Dougherty has a value of 26.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(18.4)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (26.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.0).
Prior Value
(20.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Lee

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Lee

20.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (18.4), Lee has a value of 20.8 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(18.4)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (20.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.0).
Prior Value
(21.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Marion

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Marion

67.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (16.8), Marion has a value of 67.2 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(16.8)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Sumter

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Sumter

20.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (16.8), Sumter has a value of 20.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(16.8)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Worth

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Worth

34.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (18.4), Worth has a value of 34.3 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(18.4)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Dougherty

17.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 17.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (14.8), Dougherty has a value of 17.2 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Dougherty has a value of 17.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (17.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.9).
Prior Value
(14.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Dougherty

98.8
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (69.7), Dougherty has a value of 98.8 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (98.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (61.3).
Prior Value
(61.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Lee

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Lee

83.2
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (69.7), Lee has a value of 83.2 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (83.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (71.8).
Prior Value
(71.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Macon

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Macon

39.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (59.3), Macon has a value of 39.3 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(59.3)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Macon (39.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (52.8).
Prior Value
(52.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Marion

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Marion

31.1
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (45.6), Marion has a value of 31.1 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(45.6)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Marion (31.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (72.4).
Prior Value
(72.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Mitchell

23.7
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (69.7), Mitchell has a value of 23.7 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (23.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (60.4).
Prior Value
(60.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mitchell value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Sumter

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Sumter

76.2
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (69.7), Sumter has a value of 76.2 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (76.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (68.3).
Prior Value
(68.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sumter value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Terrell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Terrell

78.1
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (67.5), Terrell has a value of 78.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(67.5)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Worth

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Worth

88.1
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (69.7), Worth has a value of 88.1 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (88.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (73.0).
Prior Value
(73.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Dougherty

14.0
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (19.1), Dougherty has a value of 14.0 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(19.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dougherty (14.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.7).
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dougherty value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Lee

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Lee

36.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (19.1), Lee has a value of 36.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(19.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Lee (36.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.3).
Prior Value
(28.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lee value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Mitchell

27.7
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (19.1), Mitchell has a value of 27.7 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(19.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (27.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27.3).
Prior Value
(27.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Sumter

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Sumter

23.7
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (19.1), Sumter has a value of 23.7 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(19.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Sumter (23.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.1).
Prior Value
(21.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Worth

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Worth

27.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the GA Value (19.1), Worth has a value of 27.3 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(19.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Worth (27.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.3).
Prior Value
(31.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Worth value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Dougherty

23.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 23.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.6.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 23.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (18.1), Dougherty has a value of 23.5 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Dougherty has a value of 23.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Lee

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Lee

11.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 11.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.6.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 11.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (18.1), Lee has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Lee has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Mitchell

6.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2006-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 6.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.9.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 6.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,098 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (10.2), Mitchell has a value of 6.1 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(10.2)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Mitchell (6.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.3).
Prior Value
(7.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Sumter

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Sumter

14.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 14.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.6.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 14.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (18.1), Sumter has a value of 14.8 which is lower and better.
GA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Sumter has a value of 14.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Worth

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Worth

19.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 19.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.6.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 19.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the GA Value (18.1), Worth has a value of 19.7 which is higher and worse.
GA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the Georgia State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Worth has a value of 19.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Adults with Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Adults with Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Albany

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Albany

5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Albany has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albany has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), Albany has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Albany has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Americus

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Americus

5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Americus has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Americus has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), Americus has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Americus has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Andersonville

Current Value:
6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 6.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Andersonville has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), Andersonville has a value of 6.9% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Andersonville has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Baconton

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Baconton

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Baconton has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Baconton has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), Baconton has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Baconton has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Bronwood

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Bronwood

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 6.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bronwood has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (7.4%), Bronwood has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Bronwood has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Buena Vista

Current Value:
5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (7.9%), Buena Vista has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Buena Vista has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Byromville

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Byromville

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Byromville has a value of 7.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Byromville has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), Byromville has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Byromville has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Camilla

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Camilla

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Camilla has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camilla has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), Camilla has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Camilla has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Dawson

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Dawson

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dawson has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dawson has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (7.4%), Dawson has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Dawson has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): De Soto

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): De Soto

6.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, De Soto has a value of 6.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, De Soto has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), De Soto has a value of 6.6%.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), De Soto has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Dooling

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Dooling

6.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Dooling has a value of 6.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dooling has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), Dooling has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Dooling has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Ellaville

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Ellaville

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ellaville has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (7.5%), Ellaville has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
Schley, GA County Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Ellaville has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Ideal

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Ideal

7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Ideal has a value of 7.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ideal has a value of 7.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (6.5%), Ideal has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Ideal has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Leesburg

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Leesburg

5.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (6.4%), Leesburg has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Leesburg has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Leslie

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Leslie

7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Leslie has a value of 7.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leslie has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), Leslie has a value of 7.2% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Leslie has a value of 7.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Lilly

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Lilly

5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lilly has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lilly has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), Lilly has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Lilly has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Lumpkin

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Lumpkin

3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lumpkin has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (4.8%), Lumpkin has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Lumpkin has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Marshallville

Current Value:
6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Marshallville has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (6.5%), Marshallville has a value of 6.5%.
Macon, GA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Marshallville has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Meigs

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Meigs

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Meigs has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meigs has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), Meigs has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Meigs has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Montezuma

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Montezuma

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Montezuma has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (6.5%), Montezuma has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Montezuma has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Oglethorpe

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oglethorpe has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (6.5%), Oglethorpe has a value of 6.5%.
Macon, GA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Oglethorpe has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Parrott

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Parrott

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Parrott has a value of 9.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Parrott has a value of 9.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (7.4%), Parrott has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Parrott has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Pelham

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Pelham

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pelham has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pelham has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), Pelham has a value of 6.8%.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Pelham has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Pinehurst

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Pinehurst

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pinehurst has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), Pinehurst has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Pinehurst has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Plains

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Plains

9.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Plains has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Plains has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), Plains has a value of 9.8% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Plains has a value of 9.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Poulan

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Poulan

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Poulan has a value of 7.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Poulan has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), Poulan has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Poulan has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Putney

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Putney

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Putney has a value of 6.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Putney has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), Putney has a value of 6.7% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Putney has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Richland

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Richland

7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Richland has a value of 7.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Richland has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (4.8%), Richland has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Richland has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Sale City

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Sale City

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sale City has a value of 7.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sale City has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), Sale City has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Sale City has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Sasser

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Sasser

7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sasser has a value of 7.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sasser has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (7.4%), Sasser has a value of 7.4%.
Terrell, GA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Sasser has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Smithville

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Smithville

5.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Smithville has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Smithville has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (6.4%), Smithville has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Smithville has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Sumner

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Sumner

6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sumner has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sumner has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), Sumner has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Sumner has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Sylvester

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Sylvester

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sylvester has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), Sylvester has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Sylvester has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Unadilla

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Unadilla

4.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Unadilla has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), Unadilla has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Unadilla has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Vienna

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Vienna

5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Vienna has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Vienna has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), Vienna has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Vienna has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Warwick

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Warwick

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Warwick has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warwick has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), Warwick has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Warwick has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Place (City): Webster County

Current Value:
6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Census Places, Webster County has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
GA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 620 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Webster County has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (8.3%), Webster County has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
Webster, GA County Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Webster County has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Dooly

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Dooly

7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dooly has a value of 7.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dooly has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Dooly has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Dougherty

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Dougherty

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Dougherty has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dougherty has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Dougherty has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Lee

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Lee

6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Lee has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lee has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Lee has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Macon

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Macon

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Macon has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Macon has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Macon has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Marion

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Marion

7.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Marion has a value of 7.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Marion has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Marion has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Mitchell

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Mitchell

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Mitchell has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mitchell has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Mitchell has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Schley

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Schley

7.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Schley has a value of 7.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Schley has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Schley has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Stewart

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Stewart

4.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Stewart has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stewart has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Stewart has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Sumter

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Sumter

6.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Sumter has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sumter has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Sumter has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Terrell

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Terrell

7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Terrell has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Terrell has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Terrell has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Webster

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Webster

8.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Webster has a value of 8.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Webster has a value of 8.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Webster has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer County: Worth

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Worth

7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Counties, Worth has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
GA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 159 Georgia counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Worth has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Worth has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31007

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31007

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31007 has a value of 7.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31007 has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), 31007 has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31007 has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31041

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31041

7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31041 has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31041 has a value of 7.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (6.5%), 31041 has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31041 has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31051

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31051

5.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31051 has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31051 has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), 31051 has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31051 has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31057

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31057

6.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31057 has a value of 6.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31057 has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (6.5%), 31057 has a value of 6.6% which is higher and worse.
Macon, GA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31057 has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31058

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31058

6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31058 has a value of 6.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31058 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (7.9%), 31058 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31058 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31063

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31063

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31063 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31063 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (6.5%), 31063 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31063 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31068

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31068

4.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31068 has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31068 has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Macon, GA County Value (6.5%), 31068 has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
Macon, GA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Macon County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31068 has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31070

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31070

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31070 has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31070 has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), 31070 has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31070 has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31091

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31091

5.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31091 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31091 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), 31091 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31091 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31092

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31092

6.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31092 has a value of 6.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31092 has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), 31092 has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31092 has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31701

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31701

5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31701 has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31701 has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), 31701 has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31701 has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31705

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31705

4.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31705 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31705 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), 31705 has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31705 has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31707

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31707

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31707 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31707 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), 31707 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31707 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31709

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31709

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31709 has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31709 has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), 31709 has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31709 has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31711

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31711

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31711 has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31711 has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), 31711 has a value of 6.8% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31711 has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31716

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31716

6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31716 has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31716 has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), 31716 has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31716 has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31719

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31719

5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31719 has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31719 has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), 31719 has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31719 has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31721

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31721

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31721 has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31721 has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), 31721 has a value of 6.8% which is higher and worse.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31721 has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31730

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31730

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31730 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31730 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), 31730 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31730 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31735

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31735

8.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31735 has a value of 8.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31735 has a value of 8.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), 31735 has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31735 has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31743

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31743

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31743 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31743 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), 31743 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31743 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31763

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31763

5.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31763 has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31763 has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (6.4%), 31763 has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31763 has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31764

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31764

6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31764 has a value of 6.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31764 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), 31764 has a value of 6.9% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31764 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31772

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31772

7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31772 has a value of 7.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31772 has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), 31772 has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31772 has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31779

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31779

5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31779 has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31779 has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), 31779 has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31779 has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31780

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31780

8.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31780 has a value of 8.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31780 has a value of 8.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Sumter, GA County Value (6.6%), 31780 has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
Sumter, GA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Sumter County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31780 has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31781

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31781

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31781 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31781 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), 31781 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31781 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31784

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31784

6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31784 has a value of 6.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31784 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mitchell, GA County Value (6.8%), 31784 has a value of 6.9% which is higher and worse.
Mitchell, GA County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mitchell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31784 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31787

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31787

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31787 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31787 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lee, GA County Value (6.4%), 31787 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Lee, GA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lee County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31787 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31789

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31789

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31789 has a value of 7.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31789 has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), 31789 has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31789 has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31791

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31791

6.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31791 has a value of 6.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31791 has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), 31791 has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31791 has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31796

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31796

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31796 has a value of 7.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31796 has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Worth, GA County Value (7.7%), 31796 has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
Worth, GA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Worth County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31796 has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31801

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31801

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31801 has a value of 6.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31801 has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (7.9%), 31801 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31801 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31803

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31803

6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31803 has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31803 has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Marion, GA County Value (7.9%), 31803 has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
Marion, GA County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Marion County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31803 has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31806

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31806

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31806 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31806 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Schley, GA County Value (7.5%), 31806 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Schley, GA County Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Schley County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31806 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31814

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31814

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31814 has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31814 has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (4.8%), 31814 has a value of 6.3% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31814 has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31815

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31815

4.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31815 has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31815 has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (4.8%), 31815 has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
Stewart, GA County Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31815 has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31821

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31821

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31821 has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31821 has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (4.8%), 31821 has a value of 6.8% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31821 has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31824

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31824

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31824 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31824 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (8.3%), 31824 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Webster, GA County Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31824 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31825

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31825

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31825 has a value of 7.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31825 has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Stewart, GA County Value (4.8%), 31825 has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
Stewart, GA County Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Stewart County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31825 has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31832

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 31832

9.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 31832 has a value of 9.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 31832 has a value of 9.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Webster, GA County Value (8.3%), 31832 has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
Webster, GA County Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Webster County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 31832 has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 39826

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 39826

7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39826 has a value of 7.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39826 has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (7.4%), 39826 has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 39826 has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 39842

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 39842

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39842 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39842 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (7.4%), 39842 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Terrell, GA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 39842 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 39877

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 39877

8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39877 has a value of 8.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39877 has a value of 8.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (7.4%), 39877 has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 39877 has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 39885

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 39885

7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to GA Zip Codes, 39885 has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
GA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 728 Georgia zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 39885 has a value of 7.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Terrell, GA County Value (7.4%), 39885 has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
Terrell, GA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Terrell County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 39885 has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13093970100

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13093970100

5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970100 has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), 13093970100 has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 13093970100 has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13093970200

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13093970200

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970200 has a value of 6.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), 13093970200 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 13093970200 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13093970300

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13093970300

6.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13093970300 has a value of 6.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dooly, GA County Value (7.3%), 13093970300 has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
Dooly, GA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dooly County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 13093970300 has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13095000100

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13095000100

4.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000100 has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), 13095000100 has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 13095000100 has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13095000200

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13095000200

4.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000200 has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), 13095000200 has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 13095000200 has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13095000400

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13095000400

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000400 has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), 13095000400 has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 13095000400 has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13095000501

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 13095000501

5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 13095000501 has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Dougherty, GA County Value (6.3%), 13095000501 has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
Dougherty, GA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Dougherty County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 13095000501 has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.